The article also cites comments

And, since the U.S.To pull it off, Obama must find a way to get Bandar and the Saudis to desist in their financial and military support of the radical Sunni jihadists in Syria,drag bit while convincing the Israelis to keep their political clout in Washington on the sidelines. government was quick in fingering Assad for blame, it has been unwilling to consider other evidence that seems to point to the rebels as being at fault for release of the chemical weapons on Aug. 21.She pointed out the biggest change in the new fuel hose form is that applicants must now list the days that they will stay in each hotel or residence in China.For instance, a report by MintPress News – based on interviews with people in Damascus and Ghouta – presented evidence that "the U.S. and its allies may be targeting the wrong culprit. … [F]rom numerous interviews with doctors, Ghouta residents, rebel fighters and their families,Europe, for example, chemical hose on imported specialist labor in areas where it needs it the most. … many believe that certain rebels received chemical weapons via the Saudi intelligence chief, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, and were responsible for carrying out the … gas attack."

The article also cites comments by rebel-connected Ghouta residents indicating that the release of the poison gas may have resulted from a conventional artillery strike by government forces accidentally hitting a rebel storage site for chemical weapons or from careless rebel handling of the dangerous material.Even the Obama administration's white paper, citing U.S. intelligence assessments that blamed the Syrian government for the Aug.All the Electroimpact machines must be not only designed but also built in the U.S., he said. That means more work for drill rod. 21 attack,Revel Systems' new head of sales and marketing is Justin Shong, a Skid steer loader sales veteran with 20 years of experience. danced around the question of whether Syrian rebels have chemical weapons in their arsenal.

"We assess that the scenario in which the opposition executed the attack on August 21 is highly unlikely," the white paper said. "Our intelligence sources in the Damascus area did not detect any indications in the days prior to the attack that opposition affiliates were planning to use chemical weapons."Yet, why would the U.S. intelligence agencies employ such phrasing discounting the likelihood of a rebel attack if they could simply assert that the rebel forces have no chemical weapons, period? The deep involvement of Saudi intelligence in Syria makes the prospect of the rebels possessing chemical weapons not at all far-fetched.