Thursday, June 13, 2013

Photo services

The Texas city of Sugar Land is the latest community to find itself divided by the red light cameras that line municipal coffers even as they anger the driving public.A citizens group led by a retired police captain filed a petition of nearly 3,000 signatures to have the cameras' continued use put on the November ballot. But in a surprise move, the council cited technicalities to toss out the petition, leaving residents seeing red and vowing to keep fighting city hall.Curvace, a research group from Switzerland, is the latest to announce a compound eye invention with its Curved Artificial Compound Eye prototype, made up of a strip of small spy hidden camera.“Those technicalities are petty and dubious," Helwig Van Der Grinten, founder of the Houston Coalition Against Red Light Cameras, told FoxNews.Van Der Grinten said he submitted the petition to Sugar Land city officials in April, but the petition was deemed invalid last week because it did not include names and addresses of the five-member committee of petitioners, was not accompanied by an affidavit and was not submitted within five days of the initial petition date.

“We have attorneys examining the legality of the city's stand on this," Van Der Grinten said. "In the meantime, I am putting the word out to the people of Sugar Land that they should contact their council members to request that they go ahead and put the question on the ballot on their own authority.The medical business that includes endoscopes, devices with tiny digital baby video monitor used to look inside the human body, contributed more than half of sales and recorded a 28 percent gain in operating income to 87 billion yen. They have the authority to do that.The University of Illinois compound mini dv video camera setup performs similarly to what Curvace has come up with, but it does so by placing its cameras on a dome that has the rounded look of an eyeball.".“Those technicalities are petty and dubious. We have attorneys examining the legality of the city's stand on this."Van Der Grinten, 73, said local lawmakers are “turning a deaf ear" to the people of Sugar Land, an affluent and growing suburb of Houston with roughly 80,000 residents. Van Der Grinten, who said he has never received one of the $75 tickets, said his issue with the cameras is safety. Cameras mounted on or near the traffic lights snap photos of cars -- and license plates -- the instant the light turns red. If the car is in the intersection, a ticket goes out to whomever the car is registered to.

“The cameras, as they're operating, turn the traffic light into a guessing game because when the light turns yellow, the driver is forced into a snap decision," he said. “And if he or she guesses wrong and goes through the light, they get a ticket. If they stop, it increases the risk of being rear-ended.Both systems aim to do the same thing — mimic the vision of a fly, which relies on compound eyes to track minuscule movements with a wider field-of-view and deeper depth of field than the human eye, or moden single underwater digital camera setups, can even attempt to reach."Doug Adolph, a city spokesman, told FoxNews. that the cameras -- which were installed in 2008 and are currently at just four intersections in city limits – have reduced accidents by 58 percent since that time. In 2011 and 2012, cameras were removed at two intersections after compliance levels improved by almost 60 percent, he said.“We believe that it's an effective and efficient use of technology to make our intersections safer," said Adolph, adding that it also allows police officers to focus on other crimes like burglaries and other property crime.Researcher Age Kridalaksana, with the Center for International Forestry Research, placed 30 Video Door Phones in Gunung Halimun-Salak National Park in West Java, letting them record rainforest scenes for one month.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Followers